Multi-Court Builds
Multi-court facilities built to spec, with permitting documentation and HOA design review handled from day one.
What Goes Wrong
Larger installs carry specific failure modes that single-court residential work rarely surfaces.
Submitting a permit application without site drawings or drainage plans causes county rejections that delay the project by months.
The on-site evaluation produces site drawings and drainage data before the permit application is filed, so submissions are complete from the start.
Cutting base preparation costs on early courts to fund later phases causes differential settling across the finished facility.
Multi-court layouts are phased by surface and fencing, never by sub-base compaction, so every court shares the same structural foundation.
Design review committees reject plans that lack material specifications or dimensioned drawings, sending projects back to square one.
Site drawings include material specs, surface color, fencing height, and court dimensions formatted for HOA design review committee submission.
Courts signed off without a slope check can pool water after rain, degrading the acrylic color coat and shortening the surface life significantly.
A final walkthrough with the facility manager or HOA board confirms surface slope, drainage performance, and regulation line marking accuracy on every court.
Scope of Work
From a single community pickleball court to a multi-sport school facility, the scope is defined before a shovel moves.
Multi-court pickleball and tennis installs with design review documentation and county permitting handled upfront for the board.
Basketball, tennis, and multi-sport courts built to regulation dimensions with fencing, lighting, and line marking included.
Larger facilities built in budget-aligned phases without compromising sub-base compaction on courts constructed in earlier stages.
Formatted for county permitting and HOA committee review.
Pickleball, tennis, and basketball lines to official dimensions.
Chain-link or vinyl-coated fencing with court-rated lighting.
UV-stable surface coating applied after sub-base cure.
Why Choose Us
Larger projects need a builder who understands the approval process, not just the construction.
Site drawings and drainage plans are produced from the on-site evaluation, so county submissions are complete on the first filing.
Our partners know Loudoun County’s design review requirements and format drawings to match what committees expect to see.
Every line item, grading, sub-base, surfacing, fencing, lighting, line marking, is listed separately so boards can review each cost.
Budget phasing applies to surface and fencing work only; sub-base compaction is never deferred to keep early-phase costs down.
The final walkthrough is conducted with the HOA board or facility manager present, confirming slope, drainage, and line marking in person.
Get Started
01
Submit your site details and sport requirements, and we’ll schedule a free on-site evaluation of the space and drainage conditions.
02
You receive an itemised written estimate with site drawings and documentation ready for HOA design review or county permitting submission.
03
Construction proceeds to the agreed schedule, ending with a final walkthrough that confirms slope, drainage, and line marking on every court.
Pricing Estimates
| Job | Typical cost |
|---|---|
| HOA common-area court | $40,000-$90,000 |
| School athletic court | $60,000-$120,000 |
| Multi-court project | $115,000-$135,000 |
Share your space and what you want to play, and we’ll arrange an on-site evaluation and a written estimate.